Study shows sharp increase in student debt

For many students, the hardest part of college may not be studying for tests or acing a research paper but simply graduating without a mountain of debt to pay off, as revealed in a Pew Research Center study released last week.

According to the findings, one in five U.S. households owed student debt in 2010, a number that has more than doubled in the past 10 years and has jumped 4 percent since 2007. The study also shows that almost all students who attend four-year universities graduate with debt, in average ranging from $24,600 to $34,600 based on family income.

This study was no surprise to William Elliott III, an associate professor in the School of Welfare. Elliott released a paper this year about the burden of college costs. He said loans have been making up a greater portion of student financial aid packages for the past 20 years, and parents are unable to contribute as much as they did before the Great Recession in 2008, especially in middle-income families.

Elliott said the high amounts of debt will continue to rise in the next several years.

“It’s a major problem for literally millions of Americans,” Elliott said. “It will continue to be a problem and weigh down our economy in the years to come.”

Noah Quinn, a peer educator with the University’s Student Money Management Services (SMMS), said that in 2009, 59 percent of KU graduates had student loan debt at an average of $20,500.

Jessica Montoya, a junior from Garden City, is the kind of student these findings reflect. Montoya expects that, by the time she graduates in 2014, she will be about $20,000 in debt, an amount she has tried to limit by taking on two jobs and creating a personal budget.

“My parents tell me, ‘Take what you need, don’t take extra,’” Montoya said. “I take the least amount of loans I can each semester, but so far I’m about $9,000 in debt.”

Montoya receives scholarships and grants through the University, and her parents pay her rent. However, she has worked at an on-campus job throughout her college career in order to finance her living expenses. This summer, Montoya tacked on another job and is now working 20 hours per week.

“I felt like I was living beyond my means,” Montoya said. “I hated taking money from my parents, and I wanted to be able to afford some more stuff on my own.”

In Elliott’s paper, “The College Cost Burden and the Role of Race, Income, and College Assets,” he reports that, as of 2006, about 70 percent of dependent students at four-year colleges had jobs. However, he said students should begin working and saving money at an earlier age to avoid debt.

This is what Corinne Westeman, a 2012 University graduate, did to fund entertainment expenses and pay for textbooks. Westeman began saving money in high school and continued working about 12 hours per week throughout her college career. To further offset costs, Westeman increased her credit hours per semester to graduate in three years with about $8,000 in student loan debt, which she will begin paying off this November.

Now, Westeman is living with her parents in Wichita and paying off the interest on her loans.

“This way, I can build up a little bit more money before I want to move out,” Westeman said. “I’m trying to do what I can to knock it all out.”

Although taking more credit hours to graduate early may not sound feasible or easy, Westeman said she is glad she made that decision.

“I miss KU a lot. I’ll certainly miss the experience of that fourth year,” she said. “But as far as finances go, yeah, it was worth it.”

As Elliot continues to research the costs of post-secondary education, he said the financial burden should shift from the individual student to the state and federal government. He said education benefits individuals and society as a whole, and funding children’s education should be a community effort as well.

“Colleges need to find ways to reduce costs, and community members could contribute to savings accounts or scholarship programs,” Elliott said. “The federal and state government needs to see college as a necessary investment in children’s lives, for the future of the child and the future of the country.”

 

  • Updated Oct. 2, 2012 at 10:31 pm
  • Edited by Joanna Hlavacek
  • Calvin

    Looks like 75% of this column is just a lot of moaning. No solutions, no causes. Why is student debt up? Because the cost of college is going up. Why is the cost of college going up? Let me ask you this, what has changed between the Calc book of two years ago and today that costs over a $100? A nice looking campus is nice but how much is being spent on landscaping instead of mindscaping?
    Lets put the burden on the government…that seems to be a popular solution but any poli sci major can tell you that the government is the taxpayer. So what you are really saying is let get the taxpayers to pay for MY education. So my mother who is living on a fixed income is supposed to pay for your education. That goes for other people that will never get the change to go to school. You want them to pay for something you want. Why not a house or a car? How much value do you put on something that is given to you for free? About as much as you paid for it. Go ask a wife or husband who worked so that their spouse could go to school, get a degree, and start a career only to dump the spouse for something better.
    If education is free then everyone will want to get in on it. First, nothing is free, NOTHING. So lets say everyone has access. How many people would choose to go to Harvard as opposed to KU if the cost was the same? Probably most people would head for the East coast. How spots are open at Harvard? Enough for everyone? Hardly. There are only so many spots to go around so some people are not going to Harvard. That doesn’t sound too fair. So to make more room Harvard co-opts KU and it becomes Harvard: Kansas. Does the education get better? Hardly. Do teacher salaries go up? Probably. Does the Harvard brand mean what it used to? Not really.
    So everyone can’t go to school even if it is free. Someone has to pay for it. You only respect what you have to earn. College can lower their costs if they have to prioritize but they won’t if they keep getting more and more taxpayer money.
    FYI, The money that I have spent so far for my education dwarfs what is on this column even with a couple years of the GI bill through in. I signed for it and I will pay it off.

  • Matthew Sullivan

    1: It’s not like students attending private schools don’t ever get government-backed student loans.

    2: Correlation does not imply causation. The ends don’t justify the means. And why is a rich-poor gap necessarily a bad thing?

    3: Greed is good. The only way to get rich in a free market is to give people products and services that they want.

    4: Why should anybody have money taken from them?